| |
| Below is what the bt878 data book says about the PCI bug compatibility |
| modes of the bt878 chip. |
| |
| The triton1 insmod option sets the EN_TBFX bit in the control register. |
| The vsfx insmod option does the same for EN_VSFX bit. If you have |
| stability problems you can try if one of these options makes your box |
| work solid. |
| |
| drivers/pci/quirks.c knows about these issues, this way these bits are |
| enabled automagically for known-buggy chipsets (look at the kernel |
| messages, bttv tells you). |
| |
| HTH, |
| |
| Gerd |
| |
| ---------------------------- cut here -------------------------- |
| |
| Normal PCI Mode |
| --------------- |
| |
| The PCI REQ signal is the logical-or of the incoming function requests. |
| The inter-nal GNT[0:1] signals are gated asynchronously with GNT and |
| demultiplexed by the audio request signal. Thus the arbiter defaults to |
| the video function at power-up and parks there during no requests for |
| bus access. This is desirable since the video will request the bus more |
| often. However, the audio will have highest bus access priority. Thus |
| the audio will have first access to the bus even when issuing a request |
| after the video request but before the PCI external arbiter has granted |
| access to the Bt879. Neither function can preempt the other once on the |
| bus. The duration to empty the entire video PCI FIFO onto the PCI bus is |
| very short compared to the bus access latency the audio PCI FIFO can |
| tolerate. |
| |
| |
| 430FX Compatibility Mode |
| ------------------------ |
| |
| When using the 430FX PCI, the following rules will ensure |
| compatibility: |
| |
| (1) Deassert REQ at the same time as asserting FRAME. |
| (2) Do not reassert REQ to request another bus transaction until after |
| finish-ing the previous transaction. |
| |
| Since the individual bus masters do not have direct control of REQ, a |
| simple logical-or of video and audio requests would violate the rules. |
| Thus, both the arbiter and the initiator contain 430FX compatibility |
| mode logic. To enable 430FX mode, set the EN_TBFX bit as indicated in |
| Device Control Register on page 104. |
| |
| When EN_TBFX is enabled, the arbiter ensures that the two compatibility |
| rules are satisfied. Before GNT is asserted by the PCI arbiter, this |
| internal arbiter may still logical-or the two requests. However, once |
| the GNT is issued, this arbiter must lock in its decision and now route |
| only the granted request to the REQ pin. The arbiter decision lock |
| happens regardless of the state of FRAME because it does not know when |
| FRAME will be asserted (typically - each initiator will assert FRAME on |
| the cycle following GNT). When FRAME is asserted, it is the initiator s |
| responsibility to remove its request at the same time. It is the |
| arbiters responsibility to allow this request to flow through to REQ and |
| not allow the other request to hold REQ asserted. The decision lock may |
| be removed at the end of the transaction: for example, when the bus is |
| idle (FRAME and IRDY). The arbiter decision may then continue |
| asynchronously until GNT is again asserted. |
| |
| |
| Interfacing with Non-PCI 2.1 Compliant Core Logic |
| ------------------------------------------------- |
| |
| A small percentage of core logic devices may start a bus transaction |
| during the same cycle that GNT is de-asserted. This is non PCI 2.1 |
| compliant. To ensure compatibility when using PCs with these PCI |
| controllers, the EN_VSFX bit must be enabled (refer to Device Control |
| Register on page 104). When in this mode, the arbiter does not pass GNT |
| to the internal functions unless REQ is asserted. This prevents a bus |
| transaction from starting the same cycle as GNT is de-asserted. This |
| also has the side effect of not being able to take advantage of bus |
| parking, thus lowering arbitration performance. The Bt879 drivers must |
| query for these non-compliant devices, and set the EN_VSFX bit only if |
| required. |
| |