| Started Oct 1999 by Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com> |
| |
| The intent of this file is to have an uptodate, running commentary |
| from different people about how locking and synchronization is done |
| in the Linux vm code. |
| |
| page_table_lock & mmap_sem |
| -------------------------------------- |
| |
| Page stealers pick processes out of the process pool and scan for |
| the best process to steal pages from. To guarantee the existence |
| of the victim mm, a mm_count inc and a mmdrop are done in swap_out(). |
| Page stealers hold kernel_lock to protect against a bunch of races. |
| The vma list of the victim mm is also scanned by the stealer, |
| and the page_table_lock is used to preserve list sanity against the |
| process adding/deleting to the list. This also guarantees existence |
| of the vma. Vma existence is not guaranteed once try_to_swap_out() |
| drops the page_table_lock. To guarantee the existence of the underlying |
| file structure, a get_file is done before the swapout() method is |
| invoked. The page passed into swapout() is guaranteed not to be reused |
| for a different purpose because the page reference count due to being |
| present in the user's pte is not released till after swapout() returns. |
| |
| Any code that modifies the vmlist, or the vm_start/vm_end/ |
| vm_flags:VM_LOCKED/vm_next of any vma *in the list* must prevent |
| kswapd from looking at the chain. |
| |
| The rules are: |
| 1. To scan the vmlist (look but don't touch) you must hold the |
| mmap_sem with read bias, i.e. down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) |
| 2. To modify the vmlist you need to hold the mmap_sem with |
| read&write bias, i.e. down_write(&mm->mmap_sem) *AND* |
| you need to take the page_table_lock. |
| 3. The swapper takes _just_ the page_table_lock, this is done |
| because the mmap_sem can be an extremely long lived lock |
| and the swapper just cannot sleep on that. |
| 4. The exception to this rule is expand_stack, which just |
| takes the read lock and the page_table_lock, this is ok |
| because it doesn't really modify fields anybody relies on. |
| 5. You must be able to guarantee that while holding page_table_lock |
| or page_table_lock of mm A, you will not try to get either lock |
| for mm B. |
| |
| The caveats are: |
| 1. find_vma() makes use of, and updates, the mmap_cache pointer hint. |
| The update of mmap_cache is racy (page stealer can race with other code |
| that invokes find_vma with mmap_sem held), but that is okay, since it |
| is a hint. This can be fixed, if desired, by having find_vma grab the |
| page_table_lock. |
| |
| |
| Code that add/delete elements from the vmlist chain are |
| 1. callers of insert_vm_struct |
| 2. callers of merge_segments |
| 3. callers of avl_remove |
| |
| Code that changes vm_start/vm_end/vm_flags:VM_LOCKED of vma's on |
| the list: |
| 1. expand_stack |
| 2. mprotect |
| 3. mlock |
| 4. mremap |
| |
| It is advisable that changes to vm_start/vm_end be protected, although |
| in some cases it is not really needed. Eg, vm_start is modified by |
| expand_stack(), it is hard to come up with a destructive scenario without |
| having the vmlist protection in this case. |
| |
| The page_table_lock nests with the inode i_mmap_lock and the kmem cache |
| c_spinlock spinlocks. This is okay, since the kmem code asks for pages after |
| dropping c_spinlock. The page_table_lock also nests with pagecache_lock and |
| pagemap_lru_lock spinlocks, and no code asks for memory with these locks |
| held. |
| |
| The page_table_lock is grabbed while holding the kernel_lock spinning monitor. |
| |
| The page_table_lock is a spin lock. |
| |
| Note: PTL can also be used to guarantee that no new clones using the |
| mm start up ... this is a loose form of stability on mm_users. For |
| example, it is used in copy_mm to protect against a racing tlb_gather_mmu |
| single address space optimization, so that the zap_page_range (from |
| truncate) does not lose sending ipi's to cloned threads that might |
| be spawned underneath it and go to user mode to drag in pte's into tlbs. |
| |
| swap_lock |
| -------------- |
| The swap devices are chained in priority order from the "swap_list" header. |
| The "swap_list" is used for the round-robin swaphandle allocation strategy. |
| The #free swaphandles is maintained in "nr_swap_pages". These two together |
| are protected by the swap_lock. |
| |
| The swap_lock also protects all the device reference counts on the |
| corresponding swaphandles, maintained in the "swap_map" array, and the |
| "highest_bit" and "lowest_bit" fields. |
| |
| The swap_lock is a spinlock, and is never acquired from intr level. |
| |
| To prevent races between swap space deletion or async readahead swapins |
| deciding whether a swap handle is being used, ie worthy of being read in |
| from disk, and an unmap -> swap_free making the handle unused, the swap |
| delete and readahead code grabs a temp reference on the swaphandle to |
| prevent warning messages from swap_duplicate <- read_swap_cache_async. |
| |
| Swap cache locking |
| ------------------ |
| Pages are added into the swap cache with kernel_lock held, to make sure |
| that multiple pages are not being added (and hence lost) by associating |
| all of them with the same swaphandle. |
| |
| Pages are guaranteed not to be removed from the scache if the page is |
| "shared": ie, other processes hold reference on the page or the associated |
| swap handle. The only code that does not follow this rule is shrink_mmap, |
| which deletes pages from the swap cache if no process has a reference on |
| the page (multiple processes might have references on the corresponding |
| swap handle though). lookup_swap_cache() races with shrink_mmap, when |
| establishing a reference on a scache page, so, it must check whether the |
| page it located is still in the swapcache, or shrink_mmap deleted it. |
| (This race is due to the fact that shrink_mmap looks at the page ref |
| count with pagecache_lock, but then drops pagecache_lock before deleting |
| the page from the scache). |
| |
| do_wp_page and do_swap_page have MP races in them while trying to figure |
| out whether a page is "shared", by looking at the page_count + swap_count. |
| To preserve the sum of the counts, the page lock _must_ be acquired before |
| calling is_page_shared (else processes might switch their swap_count refs |
| to the page count refs, after the page count ref has been snapshotted). |
| |
| Swap device deletion code currently breaks all the scache assumptions, |
| since it grabs neither mmap_sem nor page_table_lock. |