| \documentstyle[12pt,twoside]{article} |
| \def\TITLE{Tunnels over IP} |
| \input preamble |
| \begin{center} |
| \Large\bf Tunnels over IP in Linux-2.2 |
| \end{center} |
| |
| |
| \begin{center} |
| { \large Alexey~N.~Kuznetsov } \\ |
| \em Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow \\ |
| \verb|kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru| \\ |
| \rm March 17, 1999 |
| \end{center} |
| |
| \vspace{5mm} |
| |
| \tableofcontents |
| |
| |
| \section{Instead of introduction: micro-FAQ.} |
| |
| \begin{itemize} |
| |
| \item |
| Q: In linux-2.0.36 I used: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ifconfig tunl1 10.0.0.1 pointopoint 193.233.7.65 |
| \end{verbatim} |
| to create tunnel. It does not work in 2.2.0! |
| |
| A: You are right, it does not work. The command written above is split to two commands. |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip tunnel add MY-TUNNEL mode ipip remote 193.233.7.65 |
| \end{verbatim} |
| will create tunnel device with name \verb|MY-TUNNEL|. Now you may configure |
| it with: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ifconfig MY-TUNNEL 10.0.0.1 |
| \end{verbatim} |
| Certainly, if you prefer name \verb|tunl1| to \verb|MY-TUNNEL|, |
| you still may use it. |
| |
| \item |
| Q: In linux-2.0.36 I used: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ifconfig tunl0 10.0.0.1 |
| route add -net 10.0.0.0 gw 193.233.7.65 dev tunl0 |
| \end{verbatim} |
| to tunnel net 10.0.0.0 via router 193.233.7.65. It does not |
| work in 2.2.0! Moreover, \verb|route| prints a funny error sort of |
| ``network unreachable'' and after this I found a strange direct route |
| to 10.0.0.0 via \verb|tunl0| in routing table. |
| |
| A: Yes, in 2.2 the rule that {\em normal} gateway must reside on directly |
| connected network has not any exceptions. You may tell kernel, that |
| this particular route is {\em abnormal}: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ifconfig tunl0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 |
| ip route add 10.0.0.0/8 via 193.233.7.65 dev tunl0 onlink |
| \end{verbatim} |
| Note keyword \verb|onlink|, it is the magic key that orders kernel |
| not to check for consistency of gateway address. |
| Probably, after this explanation you have already guessed another method |
| to cheat kernel: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ifconfig tunl0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 |
| route add -host 193.233.7.65 dev tunl0 |
| route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 gw 193.233.7.65 |
| route del -host 193.233.7.65 dev tunl0 |
| \end{verbatim} |
| Well, if you like such tricks, nobody may prohibit you to use them. |
| Only do not forget |
| that between \verb|route add| and \verb|route del| host 193.233.7.65 is |
| unreachable. |
| |
| \item |
| Q: In 2.0.36 I used to load \verb|tunnel| device module and \verb|ipip| module. |
| I cannot find any \verb|tunnel| in 2.2! |
| |
| A: Linux-2.2 has single module \verb|ipip| for both directions of tunneling |
| and for all IPIP tunnel devices. |
| |
| \item |
| Q: \verb|traceroute| does not work over tunnel! Well, stop... It works, |
| only skips some number of hops. |
| |
| A: Yes. By default tunnel driver copies \verb|ttl| value from |
| inner packet to outer one. It means that path traversed by tunneled |
| packets to another endpoint is not hidden. If you dislike this, or if you |
| are going to use some routing protocol expecting that packets |
| with ttl 1 will reach peering host (f.e.\ RIP, OSPF or EBGP) |
| and you are not afraid of |
| tunnel loops, you may append option \verb|ttl 64|, when creating tunnel |
| with \verb|ip tunnel add|. |
| |
| \item |
| Q: ... Well, list of things, which 2.0 was able to do finishes. |
| |
| \end{itemize} |
| |
| \paragraph{Summary of differences between 2.2 and 2.0.} |
| |
| \begin{itemize} |
| |
| \item {\bf In 2.0} you could compile tunnel device into kernel |
| and got set of 4 devices \verb|tunl0| ... \verb|tunl3| or, |
| alternatively, compile it as module and load new module |
| for each new tunnel. Also, module \verb|ipip| was necessary |
| to receive tunneled packets. |
| |
| {\bf 2.2} has {\em one\/} module \verb|ipip|. Loading it you get base |
| tunnel device \verb|tunl0| and another tunnels may be created with command |
| \verb|ip tunnel add|. These new devices may have arbitrary names. |
| |
| |
| \item {\bf In 2.0} you set remote tunnel endpoint address with |
| the command \verb|ifconfig| ... \verb|pointopoint A|. |
| |
| {\bf In 2.2} this command has the same semantics on all |
| the interfaces, namely it sets not tunnel endpoint, |
| but address of peering host, which is directly reachable |
| via this tunnel, |
| rather than via Internet. Actual tunnel endpoint address \verb|A| |
| should be set with \verb|ip tunnel add ... remote A|. |
| |
| \item {\bf In 2.0} you create tunnel routes with the command: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| route add -net 10.0.0.0 gw A dev tunl0 |
| \end{verbatim} |
| |
| {\bf 2.2} interprets this command equally for all device |
| kinds and gateway is required to be directly reachable via this tunnel, |
| rather than via Internet. You still may use \verb|ip route add ... onlink| |
| to override this behaviour. |
| |
| \end{itemize} |
| |
| |
| \section{Tunnel setup: basics} |
| |
| Standard Linux-2.2 kernel supports three flavor of tunnels, |
| listed in the following table: |
| \vspace{2mm} |
| |
| \begin{tabular}{lll} |
| \vrule depth 0.8ex width 0pt\relax |
| Mode & Description & Base device \\ |
| ipip & IP over IP & tunl0 \\ |
| sit & IPv6 over IP & sit0 \\ |
| gre & ANY over GRE over IP & gre0 |
| \end{tabular} |
| |
| \vspace{2mm} |
| |
| \noindent All the kinds of tunnels are created with one command: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip tunnel add <NAME> mode <MODE> [ local <S> ] [ remote <D> ] |
| \end{verbatim} |
| |
| This command creates new tunnel device with name \verb|<NAME>|. |
| The \verb|<NAME>| is an arbitrary string. Particularly, |
| it may be even \verb|eth0|. The rest of parameters set |
| different tunnel characteristics. |
| |
| \begin{itemize} |
| |
| \item |
| \verb|mode <MODE>| sets tunnel mode. Three modes are available now |
| \verb|ipip|, \verb|sit| and \verb|gre|. |
| |
| \item |
| \verb|remote <D>| sets remote endpoint of the tunnel to IP |
| address \verb|<D>|. |
| \item |
| \verb|local <S>| sets fixed local address for tunneled |
| packets. It must be an address on another interface of this host. |
| |
| \end{itemize} |
| |
| \let\thefootnote\oldthefootnote |
| |
| Both \verb|remote| and \verb|local| may be omitted. In this case we |
| say that they are zero or wildcard. Two tunnels of one mode cannot |
| have the same \verb|remote| and \verb|local|. Particularly it means |
| that base device or fallback tunnel cannot be replicated.\footnote{ |
| This restriction is relaxed for keyed GRE tunnels.} |
| |
| Tunnels are divided to two classes: {\bf pointopoint} tunnels, which |
| have some not wildcard \verb|remote| address and deliver all the packets |
| to this destination, and {\bf NBMA} (i.e. Non-Broadcast Multi-Access) tunnels, |
| which have no \verb|remote|. Particularly, base devices (f.e.\ \verb|tunl0|) |
| are NBMA, because they have neither \verb|remote| nor |
| \verb|local| addresses. |
| |
| |
| After tunnel device is created you should configure it as you did |
| it with another devices. Certainly, the configuration of tunnels has |
| some features related to the fact that they work over existing Internet |
| routing infrastructure and simultaneously create new virtual links, |
| which changes this infrastructure. The danger that not enough careful |
| tunnel setup will result in formation of tunnel loops, |
| collapse of routing or flooding network with exponentially |
| growing number of tunneled fragments is very real. |
| |
| |
| Protocol setup on pointopoint tunnels does not differ of configuration |
| of another devices. You should set a protocol address with \verb|ifconfig| |
| and add routes with \verb|route| utility. |
| |
| NBMA tunnels are different. To route something via NBMA tunnel |
| you have to explain to driver, where it should deliver packets to. |
| The only way to make it is to create special routes with gateway |
| address pointing to desired endpoint. F.e.\ |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip route add 10.0.0.0/24 via <A> dev tunl0 onlink |
| \end{verbatim} |
| It is important to use option \verb|onlink|, otherwise |
| kernel will refuse request to create route via gateway not directly |
| reachable over device \verb|tunl0|. With IPv6 the situation is much simpler: |
| when you start device \verb|sit0|, it automatically configures itself |
| with all IPv4 addresses mapped to IPv6 space, so that all IPv4 |
| Internet is {\em really reachable} via \verb|sit0|! Excellent, the command |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip route add 3FFE::/16 via ::193.233.7.65 dev sit0 |
| \end{verbatim} |
| will route \verb|3FFE::/16| via \verb|sit0|, sending all the packets |
| destined to this prefix to 193.233.7.65. |
| |
| \section{Tunnel setup: options} |
| |
| Command \verb|ip tunnel add| has several additional options. |
| \begin{itemize} |
| |
| \item \verb|ttl N| --- set fixed TTL \verb|N| on tunneled packets. |
| \verb|N| is number in the range 1--255. 0 is special value, |
| meaning that packets inherit TTL value. |
| Default value is: \verb|inherit|. |
| |
| \item \verb|tos T| --- set fixed tos \verb|T| on tunneled packets. |
| Default value is: \verb|inherit|. |
| |
| \item \verb|dev DEV| --- bind tunnel to device \verb|DEV|, so that |
| tunneled packets will be routed only via this device and will |
| not be able to escape to another device, when route to endpoint changes. |
| |
| \item \verb|nopmtudisc| --- disable Path MTU Discovery on this tunnel. |
| It is enabled by default. Note that fixed ttl is incompatible |
| with this option: tunnels with fixed ttl always make pmtu discovery. |
| |
| \end{itemize} |
| |
| \verb|ipip| and \verb|sit| tunnels have no more options. \verb|gre| |
| tunnels are more complicated: |
| |
| \begin{itemize} |
| |
| \item \verb|key K| --- use keyed GRE with key \verb|K|. \verb|K| is |
| either number or IP address-like dotted quad. |
| |
| \item \verb|csum| --- checksum tunneled packets. |
| |
| \item \verb|seq| --- serialize packets. |
| \begin{NB} |
| I think this option does not |
| work. At least, I did not test it, did not debug it and |
| even do not understand, how it is supposed to work and for what |
| purpose Cisco planned to use it. |
| \end{NB} |
| |
| \end{itemize} |
| |
| |
| Actually, these GRE options can be set separately for input and |
| output directions by prefixing corresponding keywords with letter |
| \verb|i| or \verb|o|. F.e.\ \verb|icsum| orders to accept only |
| packets with correct checksum and \verb|ocsum| means, that |
| our host will calculate and send checksum. |
| |
| Command \verb|ip tunnel add| is not the only operation, |
| which can be made with tunnels. Certainly, you may get short help page |
| with: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip tunnel help |
| \end{verbatim} |
| |
| Besides that, you may view list of installed tunnels with the help of command: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip tunnel ls |
| \end{verbatim} |
| Also you may look at statistics: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip -s tunnel ls Cisco |
| \end{verbatim} |
| where \verb|Cisco| is name of tunnel device. Command |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip tunnel del Cisco |
| \end{verbatim} |
| destroys tunnel \verb|Cisco|. And, finally, |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip tunnel change Cisco mode sit local ME remote HE ttl 32 |
| \end{verbatim} |
| changes its parameters. |
| |
| \section{Differences 2.2 and 2.0 tunnels revisited.} |
| |
| Now we can discuss more subtle differences between tunneling in 2.0 |
| and 2.2. |
| |
| \begin{itemize} |
| |
| \item In 2.0 all tunneled packets were received promiscuously |
| as soon as you loaded module \verb|ipip|. 2.2 tries to select the best |
| tunnel device and packet looks as received on this. F.e.\ if host |
| received \verb|ipip| packet from host \verb|D| destined to our |
| local address \verb|S|, kernel searches for matching tunnels |
| in order: |
| |
| \begin{tabular}{ll} |
| 1 & \verb|remote| is \verb|D| and \verb|local| is \verb|S| \\ |
| 2 & \verb|remote| is \verb|D| and \verb|local| is wildcard \\ |
| 3 & \verb|remote| is wildcard and \verb|local| is \verb|S| \\ |
| 4 & \verb|tunl0| |
| \end{tabular} |
| |
| If tunnel exists, but it is not in \verb|UP| state, the tunnel is ignored. |
| Note, that if \verb|tunl0| is \verb|UP| it receives all the IPIP packets, |
| not acknowledged by more specific tunnels. |
| Be careful, it means that without carefully installed firewall rules |
| anyone on the Internet may inject to your network any packets with |
| source addresses indistinguishable from local ones. It is not so bad idea |
| to design tunnels in the way enforcing maximal route symmetry |
| and to enable reversed path filter (\verb|rp_filter| sysctl option) on |
| tunnel devices. |
| |
| \item In 2.2 you can monitor and debug tunnels with \verb|tcpdump|. |
| F.e.\ \verb|tcpdump| \verb|-i Cisco| \verb|-nvv| will dump packets, |
| which kernel output, via tunnel \verb|Cisco| and the packets received on it |
| from kernel viewpoint. |
| |
| \end{itemize} |
| |
| |
| \section{Linux and Cisco IOS tunnels.} |
| |
| Among another tunnels Cisco IOS supports IPIP and GRE. |
| Essentially, Cisco setup is subset of options, available for Linux. |
| Let us consider the simplest example: |
| |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| interface Tunnel0 |
| tunnel mode gre ip |
| tunnel source 10.10.14.1 |
| tunnel destination 10.10.13.2 |
| \end{verbatim} |
| |
| |
| This command set translates to: |
| |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip tunnel add Tunnel0 \ |
| mode gre \ |
| local 10.10.14.1 \ |
| remote 10.10.13.2 |
| \end{verbatim} |
| |
| Any questions? No questions. |
| |
| \section{Interaction IPIP tunnels and DVMRP.} |
| |
| DVMRP exploits IPIP tunnels to route multicasts via Internet. |
| \verb|mrouted| creates |
| IPIP tunnels listed in its configuration file automatically. |
| From kernel and user viewpoints there are no differences between |
| tunnels, created in this way, and tunnels created by \verb|ip tunnel|. |
| I.e.\ if \verb|mrouted| created some tunnel, it may be used to |
| route unicast packets, provided appropriate routes are added. |
| And vice versa, if administrator has already created a tunnel, |
| it will be reused by \verb|mrouted|, if it requests DVMRP |
| tunnel with the same local and remote addresses. |
| |
| Do not wonder, if your manually configured tunnel is |
| destroyed, when mrouted exits. |
| |
| |
| \section{Broadcast GRE ``tunnels''.} |
| |
| It is possible to set \verb|remote| for GRE tunnel to a multicast |
| address. Such tunnel becomes {\bf broadcast} tunnel (though word |
| tunnel is not quite appropriate in this case, it is rather virtual network). |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip tunnel add Universe local 193.233.7.65 \ |
| remote 224.66.66.66 ttl 16 |
| ip addr add 10.0.0.1/16 dev Universe |
| ip link set Universe up |
| \end{verbatim} |
| This tunnel is true broadcast network and broadcast packets are |
| sent to multicast group 224.66.66.66. By default such tunnel starts |
| to resolve both IP and IPv6 addresses via ARP/NDISC, so that |
| if multicast routing is supported in surrounding network, all GRE nodes |
| will find one another automatically and will form virtual Ethernet-like |
| broadcast network. If multicast routing does not work, it is unpleasant |
| but not fatal flaw. The tunnel becomes NBMA rather than broadcast network. |
| You may disable dynamic ARPing by: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/Universe/mcast_solicit |
| \end{verbatim} |
| and to add required information to ARP tables manually: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| ip neigh add 10.0.0.2 lladdr 128.6.190.2 dev Universe nud permanent |
| \end{verbatim} |
| In this case packets sent to 10.0.0.2 will be encapsulated in GRE |
| and sent to 128.6.190.2. It is possible to facilitate address resolution |
| using methods typical for another NBMA networks f.e.\ to start user |
| level \verb|arpd| daemon, which will maintain database of hosts attached |
| to GRE virtual network or ask for information |
| dedicated ARP or NHRP server. |
| |
| |
| Actually, such setup is the most natural for tunneling, |
| it is really flexible, scalable and easily managable, so that |
| it is strongly recommended to be used with GRE tunnels instead of ugly |
| hack with NBMA mode and \verb|onlink| modifier. Unfortunately, |
| by historical reasons broadcast mode is not supported by IPIP tunnels, |
| but this probably will change in future. |
| |
| |
| |
| \section{Traffic control issues.} |
| |
| Tunnels are devices, hence all the power of Linux traffic control |
| applies to them. The simplest (and the most useful in practice) |
| example is limiting tunnel bandwidth. The following command: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| tc qdisc add dev tunl0 root tbf \ |
| rate 128Kbit burst 4K limit 10K |
| \end{verbatim} |
| will limit tunneled traffic to 128Kbit with maximal burst size of 4K |
| and queuing not more than 10K. |
| |
| However, you should remember, that tunnels are {\em virtual} devices |
| implemented in software and true queue management is impossible for them |
| just because they have no queues. Instead, it is better to create classes |
| on real physical interfaces and to map tunneled packets to them. |
| In general case of dynamic routing you should create such classes |
| on all outgoing interfaces, or, alternatively, |
| to use option \verb|dev DEV| to bind tunnel to a fixed physical device. |
| In the last case packets will be routed only via specified device |
| and you need to setup corresponding classes only on it. |
| Though you have to pay for this convenience, |
| if routing will change, your tunnel will fail. |
| |
| Suppose that CBQ class \verb|1:ABC| has been created on device \verb|eth0| |
| specially for tunnel \verb|Cisco| with endpoints \verb|S| and \verb|D|. |
| Now you can select IPIP packets with addresses \verb|S| and \verb|D| |
| with some classifier and map them to class \verb|1:ABC|. F.e.\ |
| it is easy to make with \verb|rsvp| classifier: |
| \begin{verbatim} |
| tc filter add dev eth0 pref 100 proto ip rsvp \ |
| session D ipproto ipip filter S \ |
| classid 1:ABC |
| \end{verbatim} |
| |
| If you want to make more detailed classification of sub-flows |
| transmitted via tunnel, you can build CBQ subtree, |
| rooted at \verb|1:ABC| and attach to subroot set of rules parsing |
| IPIP packets more deeply. |
| |
| \end{document} |