| A tutorial introduction to git |
| ============================== |
| |
| This tutorial explains how to import a new project into git, make |
| changes to it, and share changes with other developers. |
| |
| First, note that you can get documentation for a command such as "git |
| diff" with: |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ man git-diff |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| Importing a new project |
| ----------------------- |
| |
| Assume you have a tarball project.tar.gz with your initial work. You |
| can place it under git revision control as follows. |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ tar xzf project.tar.gz |
| $ cd project |
| $ git init-db |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| Git will reply |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| defaulting to local storage area |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| You've now initialized the working directory--you may notice a new |
| directory created, named ".git". Tell git that you want it to track |
| every file under the current directory with |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git add . |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| Finally, |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git commit -a |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| will prompt you for a commit message, then record the current state |
| of all the files to the repository. |
| |
| Try modifying some files, then run |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git diff |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| to review your changes. When you're done, |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git commit -a |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| will again prompt your for a message describing the change, and then |
| record the new versions of the modified files. |
| |
| A note on commit messages: Though not required, it's a good idea to |
| begin the commit message with a single short (less than 50 character) |
| line summarizing the change, followed by a blank line and then a more |
| thorough description. Tools that turn commits into email, for |
| example, use the first line on the Subject line and the rest of the |
| commit in the body. |
| |
| To add a new file, first create the file, then |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git add path/to/new/file |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| then commit as usual. No special command is required when removing a |
| file; just remove it, then commit. |
| |
| At any point you can view the history of your changes using |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git whatchanged |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| If you also want to see complete diffs at each step, use |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git whatchanged -p |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| Managing branches |
| ----------------- |
| |
| A single git repository can maintain multiple branches of |
| development. To create a new branch named "experimental", use |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git branch experimental |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| If you now run |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git branch |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| you'll get a list of all existing branches: |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| experimental |
| * master |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| The "experimental" branch is the one you just created, and the |
| "master" branch is a default branch that was created for you |
| automatically. The asterisk marks the branch you are currently on; |
| type |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git checkout experimental |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| to switch to the experimental branch. Now edit a file, commit the |
| change, and switch back to the master branch: |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| (edit file) |
| $ git commit -a |
| $ git checkout master |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| Check that the change you made is no longer visible, since it was |
| made on the experimental branch and you're back on the master branch. |
| |
| You can make a different change on the master branch: |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| (edit file) |
| $ git commit -a |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| at this point the two branches have diverged, with different changes |
| made in each. To merge the changes made in the two branches, run |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git pull . experimental |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| If the changes don't conflict, you're done. If there are conflicts, |
| markers will be left in the problematic files showing the conflict; |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git diff |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| will show this. Once you've edited the files to resolve the |
| conflicts, |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git commit -a |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| will commit the result of the merge. Finally, |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ gitk |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| will show a nice graphical representation of the resulting history. |
| |
| If you develop on a branch crazy-idea, then regret it, you can always |
| delete the branch with |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| $ git branch -D crazy-idea |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| Branches are cheap and easy, so this is a good way to try something |
| out. |
| |
| Using git for collaboration |
| --------------------------- |
| |
| Suppose that Alice has started a new project with a git repository in |
| /home/alice/project, and that Bob, who has a home directory on the |
| same machine, wants to contribute. |
| |
| Bob begins with: |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ git clone /home/alice/project myrepo |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| This creates a new directory "myrepo" containing a clone of Alice's |
| repository. The clone is on an equal footing with the original |
| project, posessing its own copy of the original project's history. |
| |
| Bob then makes some changes and commits them: |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| (edit files) |
| $ git commit -a |
| (repeat as necessary) |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| When he's ready, he tells Alice to pull changes from the repository |
| at /home/bob/myrepo. She does this with: |
| |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| $ cd /home/alice/project |
| $ git pull /home/bob/myrepo |
| ------------------------------------------------ |
| |
| This actually pulls changes from the branch in Bob's repository named |
| "master". Alice could request a different branch by adding the name |
| of the branch to the end of the git pull command line. |
| |
| This merges Bob's changes into her repository; "git whatchanged" will |
| now show the new commits. If Alice has made her own changes in the |
| meantime, then Bob's changes will be merged in, and she will need to |
| manually fix any conflicts. |
| |
| A more cautious Alice might wish to examine Bob's changes before |
| pulling them. She can do this by creating a temporary branch just |
| for the purpose of studying Bob's changes: |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| $ git fetch /home/bob/myrepo master:bob-incoming |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| which fetches the changes from Bob's master branch into a new branch |
| named bob-incoming. (Unlike git pull, git fetch just fetches a copy |
| of Bob's line of development without doing any merging). Then |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| $ git whatchanged -p master..bob-incoming |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| shows a list of all the changes that Bob made since he branched from |
| Alice's master branch. |
| |
| After examing those changes, and possibly fixing things, Alice can |
| pull the changes into her master branch: |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| $ git checkout master |
| $ git pull . bob-incoming |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| The last command is a pull from the "bob-incoming" branch in Alice's |
| own repository. |
| |
| Later, Bob can update his repo with Alice's latest changes using |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| $ git pull |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| Note that he doesn't need to give the path to Alice's repository; |
| when Bob cloned Alice's repository, git stored the location of her |
| repository in the file .git/remotes/origin, and that location is used |
| as the default for pulls. |
| |
| Bob may also notice a branch in his repository that he didn't create: |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| $ git branch |
| * master |
| origin |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| The "origin" branch, which was created automatically by "git clone", |
| is a pristine copy of Alice's master branch; Bob should never commit |
| to it. |
| |
| If Bob later decides to work from a different host, he can still |
| perform clones and pulls using the ssh protocol: |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| $ git clone alice.org:/home/alice/project myrepo |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| Alternatively, git has a native protocol, or can use rsync or http; |
| see gitlink:git-pull[1] for details. |
| |
| Git can also be used in a CVS-like mode, with a central repository |
| that various users push changes to; see gitlink:git-push[1] and |
| link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users]. |
| |
| Keeping track of history |
| ------------------------ |
| |
| Git history is represented as a series of interrelated commits. The |
| most recent commit in the currently checked-out branch can always be |
| referred to as HEAD, and the "parent" of any commit can always be |
| referred to by appending a caret, "^", to the end of the name of the |
| commit. So, for example, |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| git diff HEAD^ HEAD |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| shows the difference between the most-recently checked-in state of |
| the tree and the previous state, and |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| git diff HEAD^^ HEAD^ |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| shows the difference between that previous state and the state two |
| commits ago. Also, HEAD~5 can be used as a shorthand for HEAD{caret}{caret}{caret}{caret}{caret}, |
| and more generally HEAD~n can refer to the nth previous commit. |
| Commits representing merges have more than one parent, and you can |
| specify which parent to follow in that case; see |
| gitlink:git-rev-parse[1]. |
| |
| The name of a branch can also be used to refer to the most recent |
| commit on that branch; so you can also say things like |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| git diff HEAD experimental |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| to see the difference between the most-recently committed tree in |
| the current branch and the most-recently committed tree in the |
| experimental branch. |
| |
| But you may find it more useful to see the list of commits made in |
| the experimental branch but not in the current branch, and |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| git whatchanged HEAD..experimental |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| will do that, just as |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| git whatchanged experimental..HEAD |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| will show the list of commits made on the HEAD but not included in |
| experimental. |
| |
| You can also give commits convenient names of your own: after running |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| $ git-tag v2.5 HEAD^^ |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| you can refer to HEAD^^ by the name "v2.5". If you intend to share |
| this name with other people (for example, to identify a release |
| version), you should create a "tag" object, and perhaps sign it; see |
| gitlink:git-tag[1] for details. |
| |
| You can revisit the old state of a tree, and make further |
| modifications if you wish, using git branch: the command |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| $ git branch stable-release v2.5 |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| will create a new branch named "stable-release" starting from the |
| commit which you tagged with the name v2.5. |
| |
| You can reset the state of any branch to an earlier commit at any |
| time with |
| |
| ------------------------------------- |
| $ git reset --hard v2.5 |
| ------------------------------------- |
| |
| This will remove all later commits from this branch and reset the |
| working tree to the state it had when the given commit was made. If |
| this branch is the only branch containing the later commits, those |
| later changes will be lost. Don't use "git reset" on a |
| publicly-visible branch that other developers pull from, as git will |
| be confused by history that disappears in this way. |
| |
| Next Steps |
| ---------- |
| |
| Some good commands to explore next: |
| |
| * gitlink:git-diff[1]: This flexible command does much more than |
| we've seen in the few examples above. |
| |
| * gitlink:git-format-patch[1], gitlink:git-am[1]: These convert |
| series of git commits into emailed patches, and vice versa, |
| useful for projects such as the linux kernel which rely heavily |
| on emailed patches. |
| |
| * gitlink:git-bisect[1]: When there is a regression in your |
| project, one way to track down the bug is by searching through |
| the history to find the exact commit that's to blame. Git bisect |
| can help you perform a binary search for that commit. It is |
| smart enough to perform a close-to-optimal search even in the |
| case of complex non-linear history with lots of merged branches. |
| |
| Other good starting points include link:everyday.html[Everday GIT |
| with 20 Commands Or So] and link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS |
| users]. Also, link:core-tutorial.html[A short git tutorial] gives an |
| introduction to lower-level git commands for advanced users and |
| developers. |