| git-subtree(1) |
| ============== |
| |
| NAME |
| ---- |
| git-subtree - Merge subtrees together and split repository into subtrees |
| |
| |
| SYNOPSIS |
| -------- |
| [verse] |
| 'git subtree' add -P <prefix> <commit> |
| 'git subtree' add -P <prefix> <repository> <ref> |
| 'git subtree' pull -P <prefix> <repository> <ref> |
| 'git subtree' push -P <prefix> <repository> <ref> |
| 'git subtree' merge -P <prefix> <commit> |
| 'git subtree' split -P <prefix> [OPTIONS] [<commit>] |
| |
| |
| DESCRIPTION |
| ----------- |
| Subtrees allow subprojects to be included within a subdirectory |
| of the main project, optionally including the subproject's |
| entire history. |
| |
| For example, you could include the source code for a library |
| as a subdirectory of your application. |
| |
| Subtrees are not to be confused with submodules, which are meant for |
| the same task. Unlike submodules, subtrees do not need any special |
| constructions (like .gitmodule files or gitlinks) be present in |
| your repository, and do not force end-users of your |
| repository to do anything special or to understand how subtrees |
| work. A subtree is just a subdirectory that can be |
| committed to, branched, and merged along with your project in |
| any way you want. |
| |
| They are also not to be confused with using the subtree merge |
| strategy. The main difference is that, besides merging |
| the other project as a subdirectory, you can also extract the |
| entire history of a subdirectory from your project and make it |
| into a standalone project. Unlike the subtree merge strategy |
| you can alternate back and forth between these |
| two operations. If the standalone library gets updated, you can |
| automatically merge the changes into your project; if you |
| update the library inside your project, you can "split" the |
| changes back out again and merge them back into the library |
| project. |
| |
| For example, if a library you made for one application ends up being |
| useful elsewhere, you can extract its entire history and publish |
| that as its own git repository, without accidentally |
| intermingling the history of your application project. |
| |
| [TIP] |
| In order to keep your commit messages clean, we recommend that |
| people split their commits between the subtrees and the main |
| project as much as possible. That is, if you make a change that |
| affects both the library and the main application, commit it in |
| two pieces. That way, when you split the library commits out |
| later, their descriptions will still make sense. But if this |
| isn't important to you, it's not *necessary*. git subtree will |
| simply leave out the non-library-related parts of the commit |
| when it splits it out into the subproject later. |
| |
| |
| COMMANDS |
| -------- |
| add:: |
| Create the <prefix> subtree by importing its contents |
| from the given <commit> or <repository> and remote <ref>. |
| A new commit is created automatically, joining the imported |
| project's history with your own. With '--squash', imports |
| only a single commit from the subproject, rather than its |
| entire history. |
| |
| merge:: |
| Merge recent changes up to <commit> into the <prefix> |
| subtree. As with normal 'git merge', this doesn't |
| remove your own local changes; it just merges those |
| changes into the latest <commit>. With '--squash', |
| creates only one commit that contains all the changes, |
| rather than merging in the entire history. |
| |
| If you use '--squash', the merge direction doesn't |
| always have to be forward; you can use this command to |
| go back in time from v2.5 to v2.4, for example. If your |
| merge introduces a conflict, you can resolve it in the |
| usual ways. |
| |
| pull:: |
| Exactly like 'merge', but parallels 'git pull' in that |
| it fetches the given ref from the specified remote |
| repository. |
| |
| push:: |
| Does a 'split' (see below) using the <prefix> supplied |
| and then does a 'git push' to push the result to the |
| repository and ref. This can be used to push your |
| subtree to different branches of the remote repository. |
| |
| split:: |
| Extract a new, synthetic project history from the |
| history of the <prefix> subtree. The new history |
| includes only the commits (including merges) that |
| affected <prefix>, and each of those commits now has the |
| contents of <prefix> at the root of the project instead |
| of in a subdirectory. Thus, the newly created history |
| is suitable for export as a separate git repository. |
| |
| After splitting successfully, a single commit id is |
| printed to stdout. This corresponds to the HEAD of the |
| newly created tree, which you can manipulate however you |
| want. |
| |
| Repeated splits of exactly the same history are |
| guaranteed to be identical (ie. to produce the same |
| commit ids). Because of this, if you add new commits |
| and then re-split, the new commits will be attached as |
| commits on top of the history you generated last time, |
| so 'git merge' and friends will work as expected. |
| |
| Note that if you use '--squash' when you merge, you |
| should usually not just '--rejoin' when you split. |
| |
| |
| OPTIONS |
| ------- |
| -q:: |
| --quiet:: |
| Suppress unnecessary output messages on stderr. |
| |
| -d:: |
| --debug:: |
| Produce even more unnecessary output messages on stderr. |
| |
| -P <prefix>:: |
| --prefix=<prefix>:: |
| Specify the path in the repository to the subtree you |
| want to manipulate. This option is mandatory |
| for all commands. |
| |
| -m <message>:: |
| --message=<message>:: |
| This option is only valid for add, merge and pull (unsure). |
| Specify <message> as the commit message for the merge commit. |
| |
| |
| OPTIONS FOR add, merge, push, pull |
| ---------------------------------- |
| --squash:: |
| This option is only valid for add, merge, push and pull |
| commands. |
| |
| Instead of merging the entire history from the subtree |
| project, produce only a single commit that contains all |
| the differences you want to merge, and then merge that |
| new commit into your project. |
| |
| Using this option helps to reduce log clutter. People |
| rarely want to see every change that happened between |
| v1.0 and v1.1 of the library they're using, since none of the |
| interim versions were ever included in their application. |
| |
| Using '--squash' also helps avoid problems when the same |
| subproject is included multiple times in the same |
| project, or is removed and then re-added. In such a |
| case, it doesn't make sense to combine the histories |
| anyway, since it's unclear which part of the history |
| belongs to which subtree. |
| |
| Furthermore, with '--squash', you can switch back and |
| forth between different versions of a subtree, rather |
| than strictly forward. 'git subtree merge --squash' |
| always adjusts the subtree to match the exactly |
| specified commit, even if getting to that commit would |
| require undoing some changes that were added earlier. |
| |
| Whether or not you use '--squash', changes made in your |
| local repository remain intact and can be later split |
| and send upstream to the subproject. |
| |
| |
| OPTIONS FOR split |
| ----------------- |
| --annotate=<annotation>:: |
| This option is only valid for the split command. |
| |
| When generating synthetic history, add <annotation> as a |
| prefix to each commit message. Since we're creating new |
| commits with the same commit message, but possibly |
| different content, from the original commits, this can help |
| to differentiate them and avoid confusion. |
| |
| Whenever you split, you need to use the same |
| <annotation>, or else you don't have a guarantee that |
| the new re-created history will be identical to the old |
| one. That will prevent merging from working correctly. |
| git subtree tries to make it work anyway, particularly |
| if you use --rejoin, but it may not always be effective. |
| |
| -b <branch>:: |
| --branch=<branch>:: |
| This option is only valid for the split command. |
| |
| After generating the synthetic history, create a new |
| branch called <branch> that contains the new history. |
| This is suitable for immediate pushing upstream. |
| <branch> must not already exist. |
| |
| --ignore-joins:: |
| This option is only valid for the split command. |
| |
| If you use '--rejoin', git subtree attempts to optimize |
| its history reconstruction to generate only the new |
| commits since the last '--rejoin'. '--ignore-join' |
| disables this behaviour, forcing it to regenerate the |
| entire history. In a large project, this can take a |
| long time. |
| |
| --onto=<onto>:: |
| This option is only valid for the split command. |
| |
| If your subtree was originally imported using something |
| other than git subtree, its history may not match what |
| git subtree is expecting. In that case, you can specify |
| the commit id <onto> that corresponds to the first |
| revision of the subproject's history that was imported |
| into your project, and git subtree will attempt to build |
| its history from there. |
| |
| If you used 'git subtree add', you should never need |
| this option. |
| |
| --rejoin:: |
| This option is only valid for the split command. |
| |
| After splitting, merge the newly created synthetic |
| history back into your main project. That way, future |
| splits can search only the part of history that has |
| been added since the most recent --rejoin. |
| |
| If your split commits end up merged into the upstream |
| subproject, and then you want to get the latest upstream |
| version, this will allow git's merge algorithm to more |
| intelligently avoid conflicts (since it knows these |
| synthetic commits are already part of the upstream |
| repository). |
| |
| Unfortunately, using this option results in 'git log' |
| showing an extra copy of every new commit that was |
| created (the original, and the synthetic one). |
| |
| If you do all your merges with '--squash', don't use |
| '--rejoin' when you split, because you don't want the |
| subproject's history to be part of your project anyway. |
| |
| |
| EXAMPLE 1. Add command |
| ---------------------- |
| Let's assume that you have a local repository that you would like |
| to add an external vendor library to. In this case we will add the |
| git-subtree repository as a subdirectory of your already existing |
| git-extensions repository in ~/git-extensions/: |
| |
| $ git subtree add --prefix=git-subtree --squash \ |
| git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git master |
| |
| 'master' needs to be a valid remote ref and can be a different branch |
| name |
| |
| You can omit the --squash flag, but doing so will increase the number |
| of commits that are included in your local repository. |
| |
| We now have a ~/git-extensions/git-subtree directory containing code |
| from the master branch of git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git |
| in our git-extensions repository. |
| |
| EXAMPLE 2. Extract a subtree using commit, merge and pull |
| --------------------------------------------------------- |
| Let's use the repository for the git source code as an example. |
| First, get your own copy of the git.git repository: |
| |
| $ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git test-git |
| $ cd test-git |
| |
| gitweb (commit 1130ef3) was merged into git as of commit |
| 0a8f4f0, after which it was no longer maintained separately. |
| But imagine it had been maintained separately, and we wanted to |
| extract git's changes to gitweb since that time, to share with |
| the upstream. You could do this: |
| |
| $ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' \ |
| 0a8f4f0^.. --onto=1130ef3 --rejoin \ |
| --branch gitweb-latest |
| $ gitk gitweb-latest |
| $ git push git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git gitweb-latest:master |
| |
| (We use '0a8f4f0^..' because that means "all the changes from |
| 0a8f4f0 to the current version, including 0a8f4f0 itself.") |
| |
| If gitweb had originally been merged using 'git subtree add' (or |
| a previous split had already been done with --rejoin specified) |
| then you can do all your splits without having to remember any |
| weird commit ids: |
| |
| $ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' --rejoin \ |
| --branch gitweb-latest2 |
| |
| And you can merge changes back in from the upstream project just |
| as easily: |
| |
| $ git subtree pull --prefix=gitweb \ |
| git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git master |
| |
| Or, using '--squash', you can actually rewind to an earlier |
| version of gitweb: |
| |
| $ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest~10 |
| |
| Then make some changes: |
| |
| $ date >gitweb/myfile |
| $ git add gitweb/myfile |
| $ git commit -m 'created myfile' |
| |
| And fast forward again: |
| |
| $ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest |
| |
| And notice that your change is still intact: |
| |
| $ ls -l gitweb/myfile |
| |
| And you can split it out and look at your changes versus |
| the standard gitweb: |
| |
| git log gitweb-latest..$(git subtree split --prefix=gitweb) |
| |
| EXAMPLE 3. Extract a subtree using branch |
| ----------------------------------------- |
| Suppose you have a source directory with many files and |
| subdirectories, and you want to extract the lib directory to its own |
| git project. Here's a short way to do it: |
| |
| First, make the new repository wherever you want: |
| |
| $ <go to the new location> |
| $ git init --bare |
| |
| Back in your original directory: |
| |
| $ git subtree split --prefix=lib --annotate="(split)" -b split |
| |
| Then push the new branch onto the new empty repository: |
| |
| $ git push <new-repo> split:master |
| |
| |
| AUTHOR |
| ------ |
| Written by Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> |
| |
| |
| GIT |
| --- |
| Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite |