ARM: OMAP3: PM: fix I/O wakeup and I/O chain clock control detection

The way that we detect which OMAP3 chips support I/O wakeup and
software I/O chain clock control is broken.

Currently, I/O wakeup is marked as present for all OMAP3 SoCs other
than the AM3505/3517.  The TI81xx family of SoCs are at present
considered to be OMAP3 SoCs, but don't support I/O wakeup.  To resolve
this, convert the existing blacklist approach to an explicit,
whitelist support, in which only SoCs which are known to support I/O
wakeup are listed.  (At present, this only includes OMAP34xx,
OMAP3503, OMAP3515, OMAP3525, OMAP3530, and OMAP36xx.)

Also, the current code incorrectly detects the presence of a
software-controllable I/O chain clock on several chips that don't
support it.  This results in writes to reserved bitfields, unnecessary
delays, and console messages on kernels running on those chips:

    http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg58735.html

Convert this test to a feature test with a chip-by-chip whitelist.

Thanks to Dave Hylands <dhylands@gmail.com> for reporting this problem
and doing some testing to help isolate the cause.  Thanks to Steve
Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com> for catching a bug in the first version of
this patch.  Thanks to Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> for
comments.

Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Dave Hylands <dhylands@gmail.com>
Cc: Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index 1915050..bfa8b8c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@ -99,31 +99,27 @@
 {
 	int timeout = 0;
 
-	if (omap_rev() >= OMAP3430_REV_ES3_1) {
-		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_CHAIN_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
-				     PM_WKEN);
-		/* Do a readback to assure write has been done */
-		omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, PM_WKEN);
+	omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_CHAIN_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
+				   PM_WKEN);
+	/* Do a readback to assure write has been done */
+	omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, PM_WKEN);
 
-		while (!(omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, PM_WKEN) &
-			 OMAP3430_ST_IO_CHAIN_MASK)) {
-			timeout++;
-			if (timeout > 1000) {
-				printk(KERN_ERR "Wake up daisy chain "
-				       "activation failed.\n");
-				return;
-			}
-			omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_ST_IO_CHAIN_MASK,
-					     WKUP_MOD, PM_WKEN);
+	while (!(omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, PM_WKEN) &
+		 OMAP3430_ST_IO_CHAIN_MASK)) {
+		timeout++;
+		if (timeout > 1000) {
+			pr_err("Wake up daisy chain activation failed.\n");
+			return;
 		}
+		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_ST_IO_CHAIN_MASK,
+					   WKUP_MOD, PM_WKEN);
 	}
 }
 
 static void omap3_disable_io_chain(void)
 {
-	if (omap_rev() >= OMAP3430_REV_ES3_1)
-		omap2_prm_clear_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_CHAIN_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
-				       PM_WKEN);
+	omap2_prm_clear_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_CHAIN_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
+				     PM_WKEN);
 }
 
 static void omap3_core_save_context(void)
@@ -375,7 +371,8 @@
 	    (per_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON ||
 	     core_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON)) {
 		omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD, PM_WKEN);
-		omap3_enable_io_chain();
+		if (omap3_has_io_chain_ctrl())
+			omap3_enable_io_chain();
 	}
 
 	/* Block console output in case it is on one of the OMAP UARTs */
@@ -478,7 +475,8 @@
 	     core_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON)) {
 		omap2_prm_clear_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
 					     PM_WKEN);
-		omap3_disable_io_chain();
+		if (omap3_has_io_chain_ctrl())
+			omap3_disable_io_chain();
 	}
 
 	clkdm_allow_idle(mpu_pwrdm->pwrdm_clkdms[0]);
@@ -871,6 +869,9 @@
 	if (!cpu_is_omap34xx())
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	if (!omap3_has_io_chain_ctrl())
+		pr_warning("PM: no software I/O chain control; some wakeups may be lost\n");
+
 	pm_errata_configure();
 
 	/* XXX prcm_setup_regs needs to be before enabling hw