softlockup: use cpu_clock() instead of sched_clock()
sched_clock() is not a reliable time-source, use cpu_clock() instead.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/kernel/softlockup.c b/kernel/softlockup.c
index 708d488..68f7606 100644
--- a/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ b/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -40,14 +40,16 @@
* resolution, and we don't need to waste time with a big divide when
* 2^30ns == 1.074s.
*/
-static unsigned long get_timestamp(void)
+static unsigned long get_timestamp(int this_cpu)
{
- return sched_clock() >> 30; /* 2^30 ~= 10^9 */
+ return cpu_clock(this_cpu) >> 30; /* 2^30 ~= 10^9 */
}
void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
{
- __raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = get_timestamp();
+ int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
@@ -91,7 +93,7 @@
return;
}
- now = get_timestamp();
+ now = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
/* Wake up the high-prio watchdog task every second: */
if (now > (touch_timestamp + 1))
