[PATCH] zd1211rw: Fix E2P_PHY_REG patching
Due to conflicting/confusing defines in the vendor driver, we were
reading E2P_PHY_REG from the wrong location.
CR157 patching was slightly incorrect in that the vendor driver only
patches in an 8-bit value, whereas we were patching 24 bits.
Additionally, CR157 patching was happening on both zd1211 and zd1211b,
but this should only happen on zd1211.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_chip.c b/drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_chip.c
index 9d299bd..87ee3ee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_chip.c
@@ -592,16 +592,16 @@
return r;
}
-/* CR157 can be optionally patched by the EEPROM */
+/* CR157 can be optionally patched by the EEPROM for original ZD1211 */
static int patch_cr157(struct zd_chip *chip)
{
int r;
- u32 value;
+ u16 value;
if (!chip->patch_cr157)
return 0;
- r = zd_ioread32_locked(chip, &value, E2P_PHY_REG);
+ r = zd_ioread16_locked(chip, &value, E2P_PHY_REG);
if (r)
return r;
@@ -791,11 +791,6 @@
goto out;
r = zd_iowrite16a_locked(chip, ioreqs, ARRAY_SIZE(ioreqs));
- if (r)
- goto unlock;
-
- r = patch_cr157(chip);
-unlock:
t = zd_chip_unlock_phy_regs(chip);
if (t && !r)
r = t;
