oprofile: Fix p6 counter overflow check
Fix the counter overflow check for CPUs with counter width > 32
I had a similar change in a different patch that I didn't submit
and I didn't notice the problem earlier because it was always
tested together.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
index 0620d6d..3f1b81a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
@@ -27,8 +27,7 @@
static int counter_width = 32;
#define CTR_IS_RESERVED(msrs, c) (msrs->counters[(c)].addr ? 1 : 0)
-#define CTR_READ(l, h, msrs, c) do {rdmsr(msrs->counters[(c)].addr, (l), (h)); } while (0)
-#define CTR_OVERFLOWED(n) (!((n) & (1U<<(counter_width-1))))
+#define CTR_OVERFLOWED(n) (!((n) & (1ULL<<(counter_width-1))))
#define CTRL_IS_RESERVED(msrs, c) (msrs->controls[(c)].addr ? 1 : 0)
#define CTRL_READ(l, h, msrs, c) do {rdmsr((msrs->controls[(c)].addr), (l), (h)); } while (0)
@@ -124,14 +123,14 @@
static int ppro_check_ctrs(struct pt_regs * const regs,
struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
{
- unsigned int low, high;
+ u64 val;
int i;
for (i = 0 ; i < num_counters; ++i) {
if (!reset_value[i])
continue;
- CTR_READ(low, high, msrs, i);
- if (CTR_OVERFLOWED(low)) {
+ rdmsrl(msrs->counters[i].addr, val);
+ if (CTR_OVERFLOWED(val)) {
oprofile_add_sample(regs, i);
wrmsrl(msrs->counters[i].addr, -reset_value[i]);
}
