Btrfs: remove bytes argument from do_chunk_alloc
Everybody is just making stuff up, and it's just used to see if we really do
need to alloc a chunk, and since we do this when we already know we really
do it's just a waste of space. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 254fd32..0bc83b3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@
u64 flags, struct btrfs_disk_key *key,
int level, struct btrfs_key *ins);
static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
- struct btrfs_root *extent_root, u64 alloc_bytes,
- u64 flags, int force);
+ struct btrfs_root *extent_root, u64 flags,
+ int force);
static int find_next_key(struct btrfs_path *path, int level,
struct btrfs_key *key);
static void dump_space_info(struct btrfs_space_info *info, u64 bytes,
@@ -3404,7 +3404,6 @@
return PTR_ERR(trans);
ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root,
- bytes + 2 * 1024 * 1024,
alloc_target,
CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE);
btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
@@ -3486,8 +3485,7 @@
}
static int should_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_root *root,
- struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo, u64 alloc_bytes,
- int force)
+ struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo, int force)
{
struct btrfs_block_rsv *global_rsv = &root->fs_info->global_block_rsv;
u64 num_bytes = sinfo->total_bytes - sinfo->bytes_readonly;
@@ -3518,7 +3516,7 @@
return 1;
}
- if (num_allocated + alloc_bytes < div_factor(num_bytes, 8))
+ if (num_allocated + 2 * 1024 * 1024 < div_factor(num_bytes, 8))
return 0;
return 1;
}
@@ -3568,8 +3566,7 @@
}
static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
- struct btrfs_root *extent_root, u64 alloc_bytes,
- u64 flags, int force)
+ struct btrfs_root *extent_root, u64 flags, int force)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = extent_root->fs_info;
@@ -3593,7 +3590,7 @@
return 0;
}
- if (!should_alloc_chunk(extent_root, space_info, alloc_bytes, force)) {
+ if (!should_alloc_chunk(extent_root, space_info, force)) {
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
return 0;
} else if (space_info->chunk_alloc) {
@@ -3869,7 +3866,6 @@
break;
}
ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root->fs_info->extent_root,
- num_bytes,
btrfs_get_alloc_profile(root, 0),
CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE);
btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
@@ -5868,8 +5864,7 @@
index = 0;
loop++;
if (loop == LOOP_ALLOC_CHUNK) {
- ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, num_bytes +
- 2 * 1024 * 1024, data,
+ ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, data,
CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
/*
* Do not bail out on ENOSPC since we
@@ -7269,7 +7264,7 @@
alloc_flags = update_block_group_flags(root, cache->flags);
if (alloc_flags != cache->flags) {
- ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, 2 * 1024 * 1024, alloc_flags,
+ ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, alloc_flags,
CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
@@ -7279,7 +7274,7 @@
if (!ret)
goto out;
alloc_flags = get_alloc_profile(root, cache->space_info->flags);
- ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, 2 * 1024 * 1024, alloc_flags,
+ ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, alloc_flags,
CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
@@ -7293,7 +7288,7 @@
struct btrfs_root *root, u64 type)
{
u64 alloc_flags = get_alloc_profile(root, type);
- return do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, 2 * 1024 * 1024, alloc_flags,
+ return do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, alloc_flags,
CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
}
