commit 3af5b90bde5000abc739996cb03fd718e753d053
author Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sat Apr 05 21:00:57 2008 +0800
committer Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Mon Apr 21 10:19:34 2008 +0800
tree 579ab3154c56dfa49e83acb463f04daed8135988
parent 7dc748e4e720c1a98185363096ad7582e9113092

[CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini()
> > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini
> 
> This part ist OK.
> 
> > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the 
> > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist)
> 
> Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start
> confusing them.
> 
> What about foo_modinit instead?

Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with

	<algorithm name>_mod_init ()

and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini.
 
Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

crypto/sha512_generic.c

diff --git a/crypto/sha512_generic.c b/crypto/sha512_generic.c
index 82add4b..bc36861 100644
--- a/crypto/sha512_generic.c
+++ b/crypto/sha512_generic.c
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
         }
 };
 
-static int __init init(void)
+static int __init sha512_generic_mod_init(void)
 {
         int ret = 0;
 
@@ -290,14 +290,14 @@
         return ret;
 }
 
-static void __exit fini(void)
+static void __exit sha512_generic_mod_fini(void)
 {
         crypto_unregister_alg(&sha384);
         crypto_unregister_alg(&sha512);
 }
 
-module_init(init);
-module_exit(fini);
+module_init(sha512_generic_mod_init);
+module_exit(sha512_generic_mod_fini);
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SHA-512 and SHA-384 Secure Hash Algorithms");