Doc: Fix wrong API example usage of call_rcu().
At some point the API of call_rcu() changed from three parameters
to two parameters, correct the documentation.
One confusing thing in RCU/listRCU.txt, which is NOT fixed in this patch,
is that no reason or explaination is given for using call_rcu() instead of
the normal synchronize_rcu() call.
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
index 1fd1753..4349c14 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
list_for_each_entry(e, list, list) {
if (!audit_compare_rule(rule, &e->rule)) {
list_del_rcu(&e->list);
- call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e);
+ call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
return 0;
}
}
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@
ne->rule.action = newaction;
ne->rule.file_count = newfield_count;
list_replace_rcu(e, ne);
- call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e);
+ call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
return 0;
}
}
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@
list_del_rcu(&e->list);
e->deleted = 1;
spin_unlock(&e->lock);
- call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e);
+ call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
return 0;
}
}
