[ARM] vfp: make fpexc bit names less verbose
Use the fpexc abbreviated names instead of long verbose names
for fpexc bits.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S b/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
index d4b7b22..0ac022f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
@@ -74,14 +74,14 @@
VFPFMRX r1, FPEXC @ Is the VFP enabled?
DBGSTR1 "fpexc %08x", r1
- tst r1, #FPEXC_ENABLE
+ tst r1, #FPEXC_EN
bne look_for_VFP_exceptions @ VFP is already enabled
DBGSTR1 "enable %x", r10
ldr r3, last_VFP_context_address
- orr r1, r1, #FPEXC_ENABLE @ user FPEXC has the enable bit set
+ orr r1, r1, #FPEXC_EN @ user FPEXC has the enable bit set
ldr r4, [r3, r11, lsl #2] @ last_VFP_context pointer
- bic r5, r1, #FPEXC_EXCEPTION @ make sure exceptions are disabled
+ bic r5, r1, #FPEXC_EX @ make sure exceptions are disabled
cmp r4, r10
beq check_for_exception @ we are returning to the same
@ process, so the registers are
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
VFPFMXR FPSCR, r5 @ restore status
check_for_exception:
- tst r1, #FPEXC_EXCEPTION
+ tst r1, #FPEXC_EX
bne process_exception @ might as well handle the pending
@ exception before retrying branch
@ out before setting an FPEXC that
@@ -136,10 +136,10 @@
look_for_VFP_exceptions:
- tst r1, #FPEXC_EXCEPTION
+ tst r1, #FPEXC_EX
bne process_exception
VFPFMRX r5, FPSCR
- tst r5, #FPSCR_IXE @ IXE doesn't set FPEXC_EXCEPTION !
+ tst r5, #FPSCR_IXE @ IXE doesn't set FPEXC_EX !
bne process_exception
@ Fall into hand on to next handler - appropriate coproc instr
