pata-rb532-cf: use ata_sff_data_xfer32()
The biggest difference between rb532_pata_data_xfer() and
ata_sff_data_xfer32() is the call to ata_sff_pause() at the end of
rb532_pata_data_xfer() which I suppose to be unnecessary since it works
without. I've also tested using ata_sff_data_xfer() as replacement, but
since we know that the driver supports 32bit IO, using the optimised
version should be safe.
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <n0-1@freewrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c b/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c
index 9d61ce5..9fb91e4 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_rb532_cf.c
@@ -54,25 +54,6 @@
/* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ */
-static unsigned int rb532_pata_data_xfer(struct ata_device *adev, unsigned char *buf,
- unsigned int buflen, int write_data)
-{
- struct ata_port *ap = adev->link->ap;
- void __iomem *ioaddr = ap->ioaddr.data_addr;
- int retlen = buflen;
-
- if (write_data) {
- for (; buflen > 0; buflen--, buf++)
- writeb(*buf, ioaddr);
- } else {
- for (; buflen > 0; buflen--, buf++)
- *buf = readb(ioaddr);
- }
-
- ata_sff_pause(ap);
- return retlen;
-}
-
static void rb532_pata_freeze(struct ata_port *ap)
{
struct rb532_cf_info *info = ap->host->private_data;
@@ -105,7 +86,7 @@
static struct ata_port_operations rb532_pata_port_ops = {
.inherits = &ata_sff_port_ops,
- .sff_data_xfer = rb532_pata_data_xfer,
+ .sff_data_xfer = ata_sff_data_xfer32,
.freeze = rb532_pata_freeze,
.thaw = rb532_pata_thaw,
};
