tree 0fd7189dc2a76e1ae165ca5d6e8c6b4e6f1761af
parent 55144768e100b68447f44c5e5c9deb155ad661bd
author Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> 1192523127 -0700
committer Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> 1192552978 -0700

Memoryless nodes: Generic management of nodemasks for various purposes

Why do we need to support memoryless nodes?

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> For fujitsu, problem is called "empty" node.
>
> When ACPI's SRAT table includes "possible nodes", ia64 bootstrap(acpi_numa_init)
> creates nodes, which includes no memory, no cpu.
>
> I tried to remove empty-node in past, but that was denied.
> It was because we can hot-add cpu to the empty node.
> (node-hotplug triggered by cpu is not implemented now. and it will be ugly.)
>
>
> For HP, (Lee can comment on this later), they have memory-less-node.
> As far as I hear, HP's machine can have following configration.
>
> (example)
> Node0: CPU0   memory AAA MB
> Node1: CPU1   memory AAA MB
> Node2: CPU2   memory AAA MB
> Node3: CPU3   memory AAA MB
> Node4: Memory XXX GB
>
> AAA is very small value (below 16MB)  and will be omitted by ia64 bootstrap.
> After boot, only Node 4 has valid memory (but have no cpu.)
>
> Maybe this is memory-interleave by firmware config.

Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:

> Future SGI platforms (actually also current one can have but nothing like
> that is deployed to my knowledge) have nodes with only cpus. Current SGI
> platforms have nodes with just I/O that we so far cannot manage in the
> core. So the arch code maps them to the nearest memory node.

Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> wrote:

> For the HP platforms, we can configure each cell with from 0% to 100%
> "cell local memory".  When we configure with <100% CLM, the "missing
> percentages" are interleaved by hardware on a cache-line granularity to
> improve bandwidth at the expense of latency for numa-challenged
> applications [and OSes, but not our problem ;-)].  When we boot Linux on
> such a config, all of the real nodes have no memory--it all resides in a
> single interleaved pseudo-node.
>
> When we boot Linux on a 100% CLM configuration [== NUMA], we still have
> the interleaved pseudo-node.  It contains a few hundred MB stolen from
> the real nodes to contain the DMA zone.  [Interleaved memory resides at
> phys addr 0].  The memoryless-nodes patches, along with the zoneorder
> patches, support this config as well.
>
> Also, when we boot a NUMA config with the "mem=" command line,
> specifying less memory than actually exists, Linux takes the excluded
> memory "off the top" rather than distributing it across the nodes.  This
> can result in memoryless nodes, as well.
>

This patch:

Preparation for memoryless node patches.

Provide a generic way to keep nodemasks describing various characteristics of
NUMA nodes.

Remove the node_online_map and the node_possible map and realize the same
functionality using two nodes stats: N_POSSIBLE and N_ONLINE.

[Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com: Initialize N_*_MEMORY and N_CPU masks for non-NUMA config]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Tested-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Acked-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Acked-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@hp.com>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>