commit | fed6ebebf132eb32478a5cbbebba3760c943970a | [log] [tgz] |
---|---|---|
author | Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> | Mon Jun 12 10:06:13 2017 +0200 |
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | Mon Jun 12 10:11:36 2017 -0700 |
tree | 65dbc52e5e4da2e5b8fa9858e77ee416b62837e0 | |
parent | f23092f19e73f5d8c3480ef02104af627a90361f [diff] |
lock_packed_refs(): fix cache validity check Commit 28ed9830b1 (get_packed_ref_cache(): assume "packed-refs" won't change while locked, 2017-05-22) assumes that the "packed-refs" file cannot change while we hold the lock. That assumption is justified *if* the lock has been held the whole time since the "packed-refs" file was last read. But in `lock_packed_refs()`, we ourselves lock the "packed-refs" file and then call `get_packed_ref_cache()` to ensure that the cache agrees with the file. The intent is to guard against the possibility that another process changed the "packed-refs" file the moment before we locked it. This check was defeated because `get_packed_ref_cache()` saw that the file was locked, and therefore didn't do the `stat_validity_check()` that we want. The mistake was compounded with a misleading comment in `lock_packed_refs()` claiming that it was doing the right thing. That comment came from an earlier draft of the mh/packed-ref-store-prep patch series when the commits were in a different order. So instead: * Extract a function `validate_packed_ref_cache()` that does the validity check independent of whether the lock is held. * Change `get_packed_ref_cache()` to call the new function, but only if the lock *isn't* held. * Change `lock_packed_refs()` to call the new function in any case before calling `get_packed_ref_cache()`. * Fix the comment in `lock_packed_refs()`. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial
or git help tutorial
, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname>
or git help <commandname>
.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration
or git help cvs-migration
if git is installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just “subscribe git” in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://public-inbox.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
The maintainer frequently sends the “What's cooking” reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name “git” was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as “the stupid content tracker” and the name as (depending on your mood):