Avoid C99 comments, use old-style C comments instead.
This doesn't make the code uglier or harder to read, yet it makes the
code more portable. This also simplifies checking for other potential
incompatibilities. "gcc -std=c89 -pedantic" can flag many incompatible
constructs as warnings, but C99 comments will cause it to emit an error.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
diff --git a/convert-objects.c b/convert-objects.c
index 0fabd89..ebea8e4 100644
--- a/convert-objects.c
+++ b/convert-objects.c
@@ -240,14 +240,14 @@
{
char *new = xmalloc(size + 100);
unsigned long newlen = 0;
-
- // "tree <sha1>\n"
+
+ /* "tree <sha1>\n" */
memcpy(new + newlen, buffer, 46);
newlen += 46;
buffer = (char *) buffer + 46;
size -= 46;
- // "parent <sha1>\n"
+ /* "parent <sha1>\n" */
while (!memcmp(buffer, "parent ", 7)) {
memcpy(new + newlen, buffer, 48);
newlen += 48;
@@ -255,12 +255,12 @@
size -= 48;
}
- // "author xyz <xyz> date"
+ /* "author xyz <xyz> date" */
newlen += convert_date_line(new + newlen, &buffer, &size);
- // "committer xyz <xyz> date"
+ /* "committer xyz <xyz> date" */
newlen += convert_date_line(new + newlen, &buffer, &size);
- // Rest
+ /* Rest */
memcpy(new + newlen, buffer, size);
newlen += size;
