Avoid C99 comments, use old-style C comments instead.
This doesn't make the code uglier or harder to read, yet it makes the
code more portable. This also simplifies checking for other potential
incompatibilities. "gcc -std=c89 -pedantic" can flag many incompatible
constructs as warnings, but C99 comments will cause it to emit an error.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
diff --git a/builtin-apply.c b/builtin-apply.c
index 1e5b846..c903146 100644
--- a/builtin-apply.c
+++ b/builtin-apply.c
@@ -14,14 +14,15 @@
#include "delta.h"
#include "builtin.h"
-// --check turns on checking that the working tree matches the
-// files that are being modified, but doesn't apply the patch
-// --stat does just a diffstat, and doesn't actually apply
-// --numstat does numeric diffstat, and doesn't actually apply
-// --index-info shows the old and new index info for paths if available.
-// --index updates the cache as well.
-// --cached updates only the cache without ever touching the working tree.
-//
+/*
+ * --check turns on checking that the working tree matches the
+ * files that are being modified, but doesn't apply the patch
+ * --stat does just a diffstat, and doesn't actually apply
+ * --numstat does numeric diffstat, and doesn't actually apply
+ * --index-info shows the old and new index info for paths if available.
+ * --index updates the cache as well.
+ * --cached updates only the cache without ever touching the working tree.
+ */
static const char *prefix;
static int prefix_length = -1;
static int newfd = -1;
@@ -284,8 +285,8 @@
{
char *name;
- first += 4; // skip "--- "
- second += 4; // skip "+++ "
+ first += 4; /* skip "--- " */
+ second += 4; /* skip "+++ " */
if (is_dev_null(first)) {
patch->is_new = 1;
patch->is_delete = 0;
