| commit | a35bea40b674b21fbdb98d982e41c46d014ced83 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> | Mon Aug 05 09:43:41 2019 -0700 |
| committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | Mon Aug 05 14:59:50 2019 -0700 |
| tree | 9bf2247236869d3f41bbd0b9a2df746fcc2ecf66 | |
| parent | 7c20df84bd21ec0215358381844274fa10515017 [diff] |
commit-graph: fix bug around octopus merges In 1771be90 "commit-graph: merge commit-graph chains" (2019-06-18), the method sort_and_scan_merged_commits() was added to merge the commit lists of two commit-graph files in the incremental format. Unfortunately, there was an off-by-one error in that method around incrementing num_extra_edges, which leads to an incorrect offset for the base graph chunk. When we store an octopus merge in the commit-graph file, we store the first parent in the normal place, but use the second parent position to point into the "extra edges" chunk where the remaining parents exist. This means we should be adding "num_parents - 1" edges to this list, not "num_parents - 2". That is the basic error. The reason this was not caught in the test suite is more subtle. In 5324-split-commit-graph.sh, we test creating an octopus merge and adding it to the tip of a commit-graph chain, then verify the result. This _should_ have caught the problem, except that when we load the commit-graph files we were overly careful to not fail when the commit-graph chain does not match. This care was on purpose to avoid race conditions as one process reads the chain and another process modifies it. In such a case, the reading process outputs the following message to stderr: warning: commit-graph chain does not match These warnings are output in the test suite, but ignored. By checking the stderr of `git commit-graph verify` to include the expected progress output, it will now catch this error. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just “subscribe git” in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://public-inbox.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.
The maintainer frequently sends the “What's cooking” reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name “git” was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as “the stupid content tracker” and the name as (depending on your mood):