| commit | a0ad53c18100226cb1a138cb9b3bc3615170be8f | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> | Sat Aug 13 23:29:27 2016 +0200 |
| committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | Sun Aug 14 13:45:52 2016 -0700 |
| tree | 7e02e1c5e093e0f955689a3a3c7219579ab0f2bc | |
| parent | 1335d76e4569fa84e52dc24c88c04daeae6e160e [diff] |
convert: Correct NNO tests and missing `LF will be replaced by CRLF` When a non-reversible CRLF conversion is done in "git add", a warning is printed on stderr (or Git dies, depending on checksafe) The function commit_chk_wrnNNO() in t0027 was written to test this, but did the wrong thing: Instead of looking at the warning from "git add", it looked at the warning from "git commit". This is racy because "git commit" may not have to do CRLF conversion at all if it can use the sha1 value from the index (which depends on whether "add" and "commit" run in a single second). Correct t0027 and replace the commit for each and every file with a commit of all files in one go. The function commit_chk_wrnNNO() should be renamed in a separate commit. Now that t0027 does the right thing, it detects a bug in covert.c: This sequence should generate the warning `LF will be replaced by CRLF`, but does not: $ git init $ git config core.autocrlf false $ printf "Line\r\n" >file $ git add file $ git commit -m "commit with CRLF" $ git config core.autocrlf true $ printf "Line\n" >file $ git add file "git add" calls crlf_to_git() in convert.c, which calls check_safe_crlf(). When has_cr_in_index(path) is true, crlf_to_git() returns too early and check_safe_crlf() is not called at all. Factor out the code which determines if "git checkout" converts LF->CRLF into will_convert_lf_to_crlf(). Update the logic around check_safe_crlf() and "simulate" the possible LF->CRLF conversion at "git checkout" with help of will_convert_lf_to_crlf(). Thanks to Jeff King <peff@peff.net> for analyzing t0027. Reported-By: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from http://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-commandname.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with “man gittutorial” or “git help tutorial”, and the documentation of each command with “man git-commandname” or “git help commandname”.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (“man gitcvs-migration” or “git help cvs-migration” if git is installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just “subscribe git” in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
The maintainer frequently sends the “What's cooking” reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name “git” was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as “the stupid content tracker” and the name as (depending on your mood):