| commit | 836ef2b69f3a8668c35a537715cf3bbc08fdcf39 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> | Sat Aug 18 16:41:26 2018 +0200 |
| committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | Sat Aug 18 09:47:46 2018 -0700 |
| tree | eeca72dd8c5a3901d1a00cd05a3749677b47c9e4 | |
| parent | f1e11c6510846321574e0ad9443843d7ba3eb758 [diff] |
unpack-trees: reuse (still valid) cache-tree from src_index
We do n-way merge by walking the source index and n trees at the same
time and add merge results to a new temporary index called o->result.
The merge result for any given path could be either
- keep_entry(): same old index entry in o->src_index is reused
- merged_entry(): either a new entry is added, or an existing one updated
- deleted_entry(): one entry from o->src_index is removed
For some reason [1] we keep making sure that the source index's
cache-tree is still valid if used by o->result: for all those
merged/deleted entries, we invalidate the same path in o->src_index,
so only cache-trees covering the "keep_entry" parts remain good.
Because of this, the cache-tree from o->src_index can be perfectly
reused in o->result. And in fact we already rely on this logic to
reuse untracked cache in edf3b90553 (unpack-trees: preserve index
extensions - 2017-05-08). Move the cache-tree to o->result before
doing cache_tree_update() to reduce hashing cost.
Since cache_tree_update() has risen up as one of the most expensive
parts in unpack_trees() after the last few patches. This does help
reduce unpack_trees() time significantly (on webkit.git):
before after
--------------------------------------------------------------------
0.080394752 0.051258167 s: read cache .git/index
0.216010838 0.212106298 s: preload index
0.008534301 0.280521764 s: refresh index
0.251992198 0.218160442 s: traverse_trees
0.377031383 0.374948191 s: check_updates
0.372768105 0.037040114 s: cache_tree_update
1.045887251 0.672031609 s: unpack_trees
0.314983512 0.317456290 s: write index, changed mask = 2e
0.062572653 0.038382654 s: traverse_trees
0.000022544 0.000042731 s: check_updates
0.073795585 0.050930053 s: unpack_trees
0.073807557 0.051099735 s: diff-index
1.938191592 1.614241153 s: git command: git checkout -
[1] I'm pretty sure the reason is an oversight in 34110cd4e3 (Make
'unpack_trees()' have a separate source and destination index -
2008-03-06). That patch aims to _not_ update the source index at
all. The invalidation should have been done on o->result in that
patch. But then there was no cache-tree on o->result even then so
it's pointless to do so.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just “subscribe git” in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://public-inbox.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.
Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.
The maintainer frequently sends the “What's cooking” reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
The name “git” was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as “the stupid content tracker” and the name as (depending on your mood):