tree 5b67788dbf4e6e819cd562c0eb2414bd39c51287
parent c19a490e37181de8fa94ae1074af4b9f9a518f95
author Jeff King <peff@peff.net> 1366141807 -0400
committer Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 1366149768 -0700

run-command: use thread-aware die_is_recursing routine

If we die from an async thread, we do not actually exit the
program, but just kill the thread. This confuses the static
counter in usage.c's default die_is_recursing function; it
updates the counter once for the thread death, and then when
the main program calls die() itself, it erroneously thinks
we are recursing. The end result is that we print "recursion
detected in die handler" instead of the real error in such a
case (the easiest way to trigger this is having a remote
connection hang up while running a sideband demultiplexer).

This patch solves it by using a per-thread counter when the
async_die function is installed; we detect recursion in each
thread (including the main one), but they do not step on
each other's toes.

Other threaded code does not need to worry about this, as
they do not install specialized die handlers; they just let
a die() from a sub-thread take down the whole program.

Since we are overriding the default recursion-check
function, there is an interesting corner case that is not a
problem, but bears some explanation. Imagine the main thread
calls die(), and then in the die_routine starts an async
call. We will switch to using thread-local storage, which
starts at 0, for the main thread's counter, even though
the original counter was actually at 1. That's OK, though,
for two reasons:

  1. It would miss only the first level of recursion, and
     would still find recursive failures inside the async
     helper.

  2. We do not currently and are not likely to start doing
     anything as heavyweight as starting an async routine
     from within a die routine or helper function.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>