commit 368b4e59061e5e6d2136d685f29c1cd01f5e0557
author Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Thu May 31 18:45:31 2018 -0400
committer Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Fri Jun 01 11:48:56 2018 +0900
tree 52fd4a4154ce5d8c6aa982f39872728b9e1a9ff4
parent 14a9bd2898b38449663644f862542d618f332952

index-pack: handle --strict checks of non-repo packs

Commit 73c3f0f704 (index-pack: check .gitmodules files with
--strict, 2018-05-04) added a call to add_packed_git(), with
the intent that the newly-indexed objects would be available
to the process when we run fsck_finish().  But that's not
what add_packed_git() does. It only allocates the struct,
and you must install_packed_git() on the result. So that
call was effectively doing nothing (except leaking a
struct).

But wait, we passed all of the tests! Does that mean we
don't need the call at all?

For normal cases, no. When we run "index-pack --stdin"
inside a repository, we write the new pack into the object
directory. If fsck_finish() needs to access one of the new
objects, then our initial lookup will fail to find it, but
we'll follow up by running reprepare_packed_git() and
looking again. That logic was meant to handle somebody else
repacking simultaneously, but it ends up working for us
here.

But there is a case that does need this, that we were not
testing. You can run "git index-pack foo.pack" on any file,
even when it is not inside the object directory. Or you may
not even be in a repository at all! This case fails without
doing the proper install_packed_git() call.

We can make this work by adding the install call.

Note that we should be prepared to handle add_packed_git()
failing. We can just silently ignore this case, though. If
fsck_finish() later needs the objects and they're not
available, it will complain itself. And if it doesn't
(because we were able to resolve the whole fsck in the first
pass), then it actually isn't an interesting error at all.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>